Omni Rankings™ | 2024-2025 Men's college basketball | through 3/28/25 games | |||||||||||
Chattanooga | |||||||||||||
SoCon page | |||||||||||||
Chattanooga schedule | Rating: 75.22 (D-I #98) Projected season record: 25 - 9 overall, 15 - 3 SoCon | ||||||||||||
Overall | Conf | Ratings and projections | |||||||||||
Game | Division I opponent | Site | Result | Score | record | record | Streak | Last 10 | Rating | Projection (correct/incorrect winner) | Chattanooga win probability | ||
1 | USC | Road | Loss | 51 - 77 | 0 - 1 | 0 - 0 | L1 | 66.07 | |||||
2 | Saint Mary's | Road | Loss | 74 - 86 | 0 - 2 | 0 - 0 | L2 | 67.18 | |||||
3 | Austin Peay | Road | Loss | 61 - 67 | 0 - 3 | 0 - 0 | L3 | 66.82 | |||||
4 | Morehead State | Home | Win | 76 - 62 | 1 - 3 | 0 - 0 | W1 | 66.88 | |||||
5 | Southeast Missouri | Road | Win | 87 - 82 | 2 - 3 | 0 - 0 | W2 | 66.65 | |||||
6 | Tennessee State | Home | Win | 85 - 78 | 3 - 3 | 0 - 0 | W3 | 67.17 | Chattanooga by 2 | 57% | |||
7 | Bryant | Home | Win | 84 - 76 | 4 - 3 | 0 - 0 | W4 | 67.75 | Chattanooga by 2 | 58% | |||
8 | Lipscomb | Home | Loss | 62 - 80 | 4 - 4 | 0 - 0 | L1 | 66.24 | Lipscomb by 2 | 42% | |||
9 | Evansville | Road | Win | 75 - 67 | 5 - 4 | 0 - 0 | W1 | 67.04 | Evansville by 1 | 47% | |||
10 | Alabama A&M | Home | Win | 85 - 63 | 6 - 4 | 0 - 0 | W2 | 6-4 | 67.40 | Chattanooga by 18 | 93% | ||
11 | Indiana | Road | Loss | 65 - 74 | 6 - 5 | 0 - 0 | L1 | 6-4 | 68.13 | Indiana by 18 | 7% | ||
12 | Mercer | Road | Loss | 94 - 99 | OT | 6 - 6 | 0 - 1 | L2 | 6-4 | 67.91 | Chattanooga by 3 | 60% | |
13 | The Citadel | Road | Win | 81 - 68 | 7 - 6 | 1 - 1 | W1 | 7-3 | 68.37 | Chattanooga by 7 | 73% | ||
14 | UNCG | Home | Loss | 75 - 78 | 7 - 7 | 1 - 2 | L1 | 6-4 | 68.32 | UNCG by 2 | 42% | ||
15 | VMI | Home | Win | 91 - 66 | 8 - 7 | 2 - 2 | W1 | 6-4 | 69.30 | Chattanooga by 11 | 82% | ||
16 | Wofford | Home | Win | 83 - 81 | OT | 9 - 7 | 3 - 2 | W2 | 6-4 | 69.25 | Chattanooga by 1 | 53% | |
17 | Furman | Road | Win | 75 - 71 | 10 - 7 | 4 - 2 | W3 | 6-4 | 69.86 | Furman by 5 | 34% | ||
18 | Samford | Home | Loss | 69 - 73 | 10 - 8 | 4 - 3 | L1 | 6-4 | 69.55 | Chattanooga by 0 | 52% | ||
19 | ETSU | Road | Win | 71 - 63 | 11 - 8 | 5 - 3 | W1 | 6-4 | 70.50 | ETSU by 6 | 30% | ||
20 | Western Carolina | Road | Win | 84 - 60 | 12 - 8 | 6 - 3 | W2 | 6-4 | 71.26 | Chattanooga by 12 | 85% | ||
21 | Mercer | Home | Win | 93 - 84 | 13 - 8 | 7 - 3 | W3 | 7-3 | 71.27 | Chattanooga by 9 | 78% | ||
22 | Wofford | Road | Win | 79 - 70 | 14 - 8 | 8 - 3 | W4 | 8-2 | 72.03 | Wofford by 2 | 42% | ||
23 | Furman | Home | Win | 85 - 72 | 15 - 8 | 9 - 3 | W5 | 8-2 | 72.47 | Chattanooga by 6 | 71% | ||
24 | Samford | Road | Win | 82 - 68 | 16 - 8 | 10 - 3 | W6 | 9-1 | 73.66 | Samford by 4 | 35% | ||
25 | ETSU | Home | Win | 78 - 71 | 17 - 8 | 11 - 3 | W7 | 9-1 | 73.73 | Chattanooga by 6 | 70% | ||
26 | Western Carolina | Home | Win | 91 - 86 | 18 - 8 | 12 - 3 | W8 | 9-1 | 72.87 | Chattanooga by 18 | 93% | ||
27 | The Citadel | Home | Win | 76 - 75 | 19 - 8 | 13 - 3 | W9 | 9-1 | 71.62 | Chattanooga by 20 | 95% | ||
28 | UNCG | Road | Win | 75 - 63 | 20 - 8 | 14 - 3 | W10 | 10-0 | 72.60 | UNCG by 3 | 39% | ||
29 | VMI | Road | Win | 91 - 70 | 21 - 8 | 15 - 3 | W11 | 10-0 | 73.38 | Chattanooga by 9 | 78% | ||
30 | Mercer | Neutral | Win | 76 - 61 | 22 - 8 | 15 - 3 | W12 | 10-0 | 73.63 | Chattanooga by 11 | 82% | ||
31 | Furman | Neutral | Loss | 77 - 80 | OT | 22 - 9 | 15 - 3 | L1 | 9-1 | 73.54 | Chattanooga by 1 | 55% | |
32 | Middle Tennessee | Road | Win | 109 - 103 | 3OT | 23 - 9 | 15 - 3 | W1 | 9-1 | 73.70 | Middle Tennessee by 2 | 41% | |
33 | Dayton | Home | Win | 87 - 72 | 24 - 9 | 15 - 3 | W2 | 9-1 | 74.79 | Dayton by 2 | 43% | ||
34 | Bradley | Road | Win | 67 - 65 | 25 - 9 | 15 - 3 | W3 | 9-1 | 75.22 | Bradley by 5 | 33% | ||
35 | |||||||||||||
36 | |||||||||||||
37 | |||||||||||||
38 | |||||||||||||
39 | |||||||||||||
40 | |||||||||||||
41 | |||||||||||||
42 | |||||||||||||
43 | |||||||||||||
44 | |||||||||||||
© Omni Rankings | |||||||||||||