| Omni Rankings™ |
2025 College
football |
through 1/19/26
games |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tennessee State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Offensive
statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Defensive
statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Conference ratings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Big South-OVC page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Big
South-OVC page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tennessee State
schedule |
Rating: 46.27 (D-I #243) Projected season record: 2 - 10 overall, 0
- 8 Big South-OVC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall |
Conf |
|
|
|
Ratings and
projections |
| Game |
Division I opponent |
Site |
Result |
Score |
|
record |
record |
Streak |
Last 5 |
|
Rating |
Projection (correct/incorrect winner) |
Tennessee State win probability |
| 1 |
North Carolina A&T |
Home |
Win |
24 - 21 |
|
1 - 0 |
0 - 0 |
W1 |
|
|
51.48 |
|
|
| 2 |
North Dakota State |
Home |
Loss |
3 - 59 |
|
1 - 1 |
0 - 0 |
L1 |
|
|
52.12 |
|
|
| 3 |
Alabama A&M |
Home |
Loss |
21 - 23 |
|
1 - 2 |
0 - 0 |
L2 |
|
|
50.93 |
|
|
| 4 |
Tennessee Tech |
Home |
Loss |
8 - 35 |
|
1 - 3 |
0 - 1 |
L3 |
|
|
50.09 |
|
|
| 5 |
Eastern Illinois |
Road |
Loss |
7 - 31 |
|
1 - 4 |
0 - 2 |
L4 |
1-4 |
|
46.93 |
Eastern Illinois by
2 |
45% |
| 6 |
Southeast Missouri State |
Road |
Loss |
12 - 28 |
|
1 - 5 |
0 - 3 |
L5 |
0-5 |
|
45.93 |
Southeast Missouri
State by 9 |
29% |
| 7 |
Howard |
Home |
Win |
24 - 7 |
|
2 - 5 |
0 - 3 |
W1 |
1-4 |
|
48.63 |
Howard by 4 |
38% |
| 8 |
Western Illinois |
Home |
Loss |
16 - 17 |
|
2 - 6 |
0 - 4 |
L1 |
1-4 |
|
47.90 |
Tennessee State by 5 |
63% |
| 9 |
Lindenwood |
Home |
Loss |
13 - 35 |
|
2 - 7 |
0 - 5 |
L2 |
1-4 |
|
45.65 |
Lindenwood by 2 |
44% |
| 10 |
UT Martin |
Road |
Loss |
7 - 26 |
|
2 - 8 |
0 - 6 |
L3 |
1-4 |
|
44.96 |
UT Martin by 13 |
20% |
| 11 |
Gardner-Webb |
Home |
Loss |
14 - 30 |
|
2 - 9 |
0 - 7 |
L4 |
1-4 |
|
44.89 |
Gardner-Webb by 15 |
16% |
| 12 |
Charleston Southern |
Road |
Loss |
6 - 7 |
|
2 - 10 |
0 - 8 |
L5 |
0-5 |
|
46.27 |
Charleston Southern
by 13 |
19% |
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
